Monday, August 20, 2012

How You Can Play Is Doing It Right


When I decided to write a Wikipedia page about You Can Play, I had never even edited Wikipedia before. I spent six hours reading the guides, learning the markup language, researching sources, and writing the page, because I think the organization is important. I think that in twenty years, being able to say "I wrote the original Wikipedia article on You Can Play" will get me cred in both the sports community and the queer community.

Here's why I think that.

The first thing to understand here is that pro athletes, in general, are good at meeting clear-cut expectations. It's what they do. They are chosen, in part, for their demonstrated ability to do as they're told. But they won't jump to just anybody's beck and call; they answer to the people they recognize as authority figures. Mostly that means coaches and officials in their organization, but besides that (current CBA friction aside) they answer to the NHL.

You Can Play isn't the first organization created to combat homophobia in sports, but it's the most effective for two reasons: they have a widely respected authority figure in Brian Burke, and they have a simple, easy way for athletes to jump on board. It's one thing to ask players to commit ongoing involvement to a social activism campaign; it's another thing entirely to just ask them to commit out loud to not being assholes to potential gay teammates. That's a clear-cut expectation they can easily meet, and after the initial star-studded video was released and it became apparent that supporting YCP is good PR, there's no reason not to do it.

And the videos are accomplishing their goal. It's not the content that matters so much--they're well-done but fairly bland and similar to one another, for the most part. What matters is the fast-expanding list of players who have filmed them. According to a Sports Illustrated poll of pro athletes conducted in 2006, 80% of NHL players would support a gay teammate. But it's gotta be hard for a gay athlete to believe that when no one's talking about it outside of anonymous polls and he's hearing homophobic slurs all over the place. The more players film YCP spots, the easier it will be for the first guy to come out. That's the next step, and the YCP folks say they think it won't be too much longer.

In addition, the act of reading the script probably helps strengthen the positive attitudes of athletes who appear in the videos. The psych literature is full of evidence that behavior leads to belief; when people are asked to write a persuasive piece making a particular argument, for example, they then profess more agreement with the argument in question, even if they don't think their opinions were changed. Expressing support for YCP likely increases athletes' investment in the cause, which could make them more likely to speak up against casual homophobia in the locker room.

That's the only real way to make social change happen. Rules and official positions are a good start, but the actual culture isn't going to change unless there are guys who are part of it saying, "Hey, not cool, man," when someone drops the three-letter F-bomb. When Cam Janssen said that sucking cock would get a guy beaten up and got a ton of public backlash, I expected him to get yelled at by management, be forced to release a statement obviously written by a Devils PR person, stop being so blatant about his homophobia, and keep on being an asshole inside his own head. And that's pretty much how it went down. But he also had a talk with Patrick Burke, and Burke's description of it after the fact made me honestly believe that he might have gotten through to Janssen. That's another thing YCP is doing right: when an incident like this happened, they reached out to the offender on a "hey bro, can we talk?" level, rather than sticking to the "homophobia is damaging and it's important to be respectful"-type language of the PSAs.

And then there's Tim Thomas, who actually did the movement a huge favor by supporting Chick-Fil-A's anti-gay stance. Because I'm sure there are other NHL players who are against gay rights, but there is not a single player in the league right now who has any desire whatsoever for their personal politics to be publicly associated with Tim Thomas.

YCP is mostly focusing on hockey right now, which I think is a good call. But I think the movement is going to spread across sports in a few years, probably after an NHL player or two comes out and the mainstream media starts paying attention. American culture in general is becoming more queer-friendly, and prejudice isn't as socially acceptable as it used to be. Football players are giving soundbites to Out.com about being totally cool with potential gay teammates. If YCP keeps being smart about how they do this, eventually they're going to revolutionize sports culture. And when they do, I'll be right there updating the Wikipedia article.

Saturday, August 18, 2012

The Edmonton Eulers Jersey Design


Some context for this incredibly nerdy photomanip I just made: Mark Napier played for the Oilers in the '80s, John Napier is the dude who discovered logarithms, and that is in fact how the name "Euler" is pronounced.

Monday, August 13, 2012

Hipster Hockey History


I realized six hours into the process of creating my awesome throwback Seattle Metropolitans T-shirt jersey that I was dripping irony on the carpet. I'm not usually a hipster, I promise, but the bespectacled, skinny-pantsed soul of my city possesses me sometimes when the subject of local hockey comes up. So give me a moment to take a swig of my PBR, and then let's talk about the good old days before the Stanley Cup made it big and hockey sold out to the mainstream.

1915-1924: Seattle Won The Stanley Cup Before It Was Cool

As proclaimed by my blog's tagline, Seattle has won the Stanley Cup more recently than Vancouver. The Vancouver Millionaires won the Cup in 1915 and the Seattle Metropolitans won in 1917, a few months before the NHL was formed. That was the Challenge Cup era, when winning teams got to defend the trophy the following year instead of having to work up through four rounds of playoffs.

The 1917 Cup series was played against the Montreal Canadiens. It was the first time the Stanley Cup was ever won by an American team. One 1917 newspaper article after the last game of the series described the Mets as blowing through the Habs' defense "like a tornado on wheels in huckleberry time" and another called the Habs' play "as clean as the bottom of a parrot's cage." (Does anyone else feel like something is somehow missing from today's hockey media?)

Because the Habs were a National Hockey Association team and the Mets were a Pacific Coast Hockey Association team, half of the games were played by NHA rules and half were played by PCHA rules. So they all had to switch back and forth each game between having six players on the ice and seven, between being allowed to substitute players in during penalties and getting power plays, and between forward passing in the neutral zone being allowed and not allowed. I gotta be honest, this sounds pretty hilarious. I would be highly entertained by playoffs hockey in which the rules changed every game. Too many men? Naw, ref, it's game 3 of the series, we get a spare!

The awesome T-shirt jersey mentioned above has a 4 on the back, which, as far as the internet seems to be able to tell, was the number worn by Frank "The Flash" Foyston. Foyston was one of three Hall-of-Famers on the 1917 Cup-winning team, and one of ten players in history to win the Stanley Cup with three different teams. The other Hall-of-Famers were Jack Walker, another of those ten players, and Hap Holmes, who is one of two players in history to win the Cup with four different teams.

In 1919, the Mets were up for the Cup again, once more against the Canadiens. The deciding game was canceled by the Seattle health department because basically everyone on the Canadiens was on their deathbed with Spanish flu. "Bad" Joe Hall actually died in a Seattle hospital four days after the game was supposed to be held. So let's just assume that if they'd played that last tiebreaker game, Seattle would've been able to beat them.

But they never won again after that. They made it to the finals once more, but were beaten by Ottawa. Attendance at PCHA games fell in the early 1920s, and in 1924 the league folded and the Seattle Metropolitans ceased to exist, along with Seattle's relevance to NHL hockey.

1924-1989: A Dry Spell To Make The 40-Year-Old Virgin Look Like Hugh Hefner

We had some other PCHL and WHL teams after that, but the NHL had laid claim to the Stanley Cup and all the associated prestige, and there were no serious attempts to bring NHL hockey to Seattle until the 1960s. In 1965, the NHL announced plans to add six expansion teams to the Original Six. Seattle was all psyched for a team, but the NHL told them not to even bother applying, because they were only going to consider cities of "major league status" and Seattle wasn't enough of a sports town to qualify.

Then the Seattle sports scene exploded in the '70s, and in 1974, the city was awarded an expansion franchise. The investment group was headed by Vince Abbey, president of the Totems, Seattle's WHL team (the now-defunct minor pro league, not the current junior league, which--just to be difficult--also includes a Seattle team called the Totems). Seattle was all set to start up a team in the 1976-77 season, along with Denver. Then Abbey started missing financial deadlines, and the NHL pulled the franchise. Foiled again.

1989-1990: Bill Ackerley, President Of The Republic Of Equatorial Douche

In December of 1989, the NHL announced that it was opening applications for expansion teams again. Two Seattle investment groups coalesced, one financed by a Microsoft exec named Chris Larson and the other headed up by Bill Ackerley, the son of the guy who owned the Sonics (Seattle's NBA team). The two groups decided to pool resources, and because Ackerley had already put in his application, they moved forward under that one.

Seattle was basically a lock for getting a franchise at this point. We had the market for it, there was Microsoft money behind the bid, there were arena plans afoot, the initial presentation went beautifully, it looked like there was no way the plan could fail. All that was left was the final presentation in December of 1990. There, in Florida, is where Ackerley went for the gold medal in Olympic long-douching. Just before the group was set to present, he met with the NHL Board in private, which he had the right to do because the application was in his name. He informed them that the Seattle group was withdrawing their application, and then he left the building, leaving the rest of the group dumbfounded.

The NHL awarded franchises to Tampa Bay and Ottawa instead. And then Ackerley rebuilt Key Arena to be entirely unsuitable for hockey, just in case there was anyone left who doubted his rightful claim to the Douchebag King throne.

Now: Okay, Fine, I'll Pretend I Care About Basketball If It Gets Us A God Damn Hockey Team

There are currently major arena talks going down between Seattle's local government and a hedge fund dude named Chris Hansen. Hansen wants the NBA back, and is willing to use the potential of an NHL tenant as leverage for his basketball plans. I'll write another post soon about the details of all this--I've been paying close attention, and showing up to council meetings in my homemade hipster hockey shirt.

Some people who oppose the arena have been saying that Seattle has too many sports teams and can't support two more, which amuses me, since hockey was the first pro sport in this city. We were here first. It's kind of... *dons thick-framed glasses* ...ironic.

Sources: